If We Knew Our History Series

Howard Zinn at 90—Lessons from the People’s Historian August 21, 2012

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Painting of Howard Zinn by Robert Shetterly, Americans Who Tell the Truth.

By Bill Bigelow

This week—August 24—would have been the 90th birthday of the great historian and activist Howard Zinn, who died in 2010. Zinn did not merely record history, he made it: as a professor at Spelman College in the 1950s and early 1960s, where he was ultimately fired for his outspoken support of students in the Civil Rights Movement, and specifically the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC); as a critic of the U.S. war in Vietnam, and author of the first book calling for an immediate U.S. withdrawal; and as author of arguably the most influential U.S. history textbook in print, A People’s History of the United States. “That book will knock you on your ass,” as Matt Damon’s character says in the film Good Will Hunting.

It’s always worth dipping into the vast archive of Zinn scholarship, but at the beginning of a school year, and as the presidential campaign heats up, now is an especially good time to remember some of Howard Zinn’s wisdom.

Shortly after Barack Obama’s election, the Zinn Education Project sponsored a talk by Zinn to several hundred teachers at the National Council for the Social Studies annual conference in Houston. Zinn reminded teachers that the point of learning about social studies was not simply to memorize facts, it was to imbue students with a desire to change the world. “A modest little aim,” Zinn acknowledged, with a twinkle in his eye.

In this talk, available as an online video as well as a transcription, Zinn insisted that teachers must help students challenge “fundamental premises which keep us inside a certain box.” Because without this critical rethinking of premises about history and the role of the United States in the world, “things will never change.” And this will remain “a world of war and hunger and disease and inequality and racism and sexism.”

In 2008, Zinn spoke to teachers at the National Council for the Social Studies conference. Video and transcript available online.

A key premise that needs to be questioned, according to Zinn, is the notion of “national interests,” a term so common in the political and academic discourse as to be almost invisible. Zinn points out that the “one big family” myth begins with the Constitution’s preamble: “We the people of the United States. . .” Zinn noted that it wasn’t “we the people” who established the Constitution in Philadelphia—it was 55 rich white men. Missing from or glossed over in the traditional textbook treatment are race and class divisions, including the rebellions of farmers in Western Massachusetts, immediately preceding the Constitutional Convention in 1787. No doubt, the Constitution had elements of democracy, but Zinn argues that it “established the rule of slaveholders, and merchants, and bondholders.”

Teaching history through the lens of class, race, and gender conflict is not simply more accurate, according to Zinn; it makes it more likely that students—and all the rest of us—will not “simply swallow these enveloping phrases like ‘the national interest,’ ‘national security,’ ‘national defense,’ as if we’re all in the same boat.”

As Zinn told teachers in Houston: “No, the soldier who is sent to Iraq does not have the same interests as the president who sends him to Iraq. The person who works on the assembly line at General Motors does not have the same interest as the CEO of General Motors. No—we’re a country of divided interests, and it’s important for people to know that.”

Another premise Zinn identified, one that has become an article of faith among the Tea Party crowd, is “American exceptionalism”—the idea that the United States is fundamentally freer, more virtuous, more democratic, and more humane than other countries. For Zinn, the United States is “an empire like other empires. There was a British empire, and there was a Dutch empire, and there was a Spanish empire, and yes, we are an American empire.” The United States expanded through deceit and theft and conquest, just like other empires, although textbooks cleanse this imperial bullying with legal-sounding terms like the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican Cession.

ABOVE: A study of people’s history will show the many abolitionists who pushed for an end to slavery. LEFT: A flyer for an anti-slavery meeting that reads “Three million of your fellow beings are in chains — the Church and Government sustains the horrible system of oppression. TURN OUT! and learn your duty to yourselves, the slaves and god.”

Patriotism is another premise that we need to question. As Zinn told teachers in Houston, “it’s very bad for everybody when young people grow up thinking that patriotism means obedience to your government.” Zinn often recalled Mark Twain’s distinction between country and government. “Does patriotism mean support your government? No. That’s the definition of patriotism in a totalitarian state,” Zinn warned a Denver audience in a 2008 speech, included in a new volume, Howard Zinn Speaks, edited by Anthony Arnove [Haymarket Books, 2012.]

And going to war on behalf of “our country” is offered as the highest expression of patriotism—in everything from the military recruitment propaganda that saturates our high schools to the social studies curriculum that features photos of U.S. troops heroically battling “enemy soldiers” in a section called “Operation Iraqi Freedom” in the popular high school textbook Modern World History.

Howard Zinn cuts through this curricular fog: “War is terrorism. . . . Terrorism is the willingness to kill large numbers of people for some presumably good cause. That’s what terrorists are about.” Zinn demands that we reexamine the premise that war is necessary, a proposition not taken seriously in any high school history textbook I’ve ever seen. Instead, wars get sold to Americans—especially to the young people who fight those wars—as efforts to spread liberty and democracy. As Howard Zinn said many times, if you don’t know your history, it’s as if you were born yesterday. Leaders can tell you anything and you have no way of knowing what’s true.

Howard Zinn wanted educators to be deeply critical, but never cynical. When speaking to the teachers in Houston, Zinn insisted that another premise we needed to examine is the idea that progress is the product of great individuals. Zinn pointed out that Abraham Lincoln had never been an abolitionist, and when he ran for president in 1860 he did not advocate ending slavery in the states where it existed. Rather, it was largely the “huge antislavery movement that pushed Lincoln into the Emancipation Proclamation—that pushed Congress into the 13th and 14th and 15th Amendments.”

Zinn urged educators to teach a people’s history: “We’ve never had our injustices rectified from the top, from the president or Congress, or the Supreme Court, no matter what we learned in junior high school about how we have three branches of government, and we have checks and balances, and what a lovely system. No. The changes, important changes that we’ve had in history, have not come from those three branches of government. They have reacted to social movements.”

Thus when we single out people in our curriculum as icons, as “people to admire and respect,” Zinn advocated shedding the traditional pantheon of government and military leaders: “But there are other heroes that young people can look up to. And they can look up to people who are against war. They can have Mark Twain as a hero who spoke out against the Philippines war. They can have Helen Keller as a hero who spoke out against World War I, and Emma Goldman as a hero. They can have Fannie Lou Hamer as a hero, and Bob Moses as a hero, the people in the Civil Rights Movement—they are heroes.”

Howard and Roz Zinn at a SNCC demonstration in Cambridge.

And to this, there is one final “people’s history” premise we need to remember—whether in education or the world outside of schools. As Howard Zinn reminded the audience of social studies teachers in Houston: “People change.” Zinn did not look to President Obama to initiate social transformation; but in 2008, he saw the election as confirmation that the long history of anti-racist struggle in the United States produced an outcome that would have been inconceivable 30 years prior. And this shift in attitude should give us hope.

As we remember Howard Zinn on what would have been his 90th birthday, let’s count him among the many social justice heroes who offer proof that people’s efforts make a difference—that ordinary people can change the world.



Bill Bigelow taught high school social studies in Portland, Ore. for almost 30 years. He is the curriculum editor of Rethinking Schools magazine and co-director of the online Zinn Education Project, www.zinnedproject.org.


if_we_knew_bannerThis article is part of the
Zinn Education Project’s
If We Knew Our History

© 2012 The Zinn Education Project.

Posted on: Huffington Post | Common Dreams.



There is one comment:

  • One of our greatest thinkers, historians, humanitarians and real teachers. Thanks for a beautiful birthday tribute to Howard Zinn, who was so seldom seen or heard in mainstream media. He would be so happy and proud that the seeds he planted really did sprout to spread our “real history”. I feel incredibly lucky to have gone back to college when I did (1979); where I met progressive instructors, and through them, Howard Zinn, through “A People’s History of the U.S.”, +++, and participated in the the feminist, anti-colonialism/intervention, peace, social justice movements. The “changemakers”. He and these movements gave me the most important gifts of my life: answers to my never-ending questions of “What the hell is wrong, here, there and everywhere, with almost everything”.

    35 years later, today, with horror all around us, his message, the lessons of our “real” history never cease to give me hope, even in the darkest hours. I share everything on this site’s plus his books, and recordings continuing to do in my small way, as Pete Seeger stressed was so important: sowing seeds, even in the most infertile, arid, hostile ground, because some of will sprout” and give someone else hope, and perhaps even motivate someone in to become active in creating a “real” solid democratic world.

    Sometimes the seeds really do sprout and if we are lucky we get to witness that sprouting in our personal sphere. I did recently. After I had finished a more lengthy sharing of the recent atrocities and my feelings about the rampant racism and militarism in U.S. and my horror at U.S. complicity in genocide of the Palestinian people, I apologized if I had rambled on too long. She said, “you know, it’s ok, because I always learn something from you that makes me think and question what I thought I knew and how I felt.” No better compliment.

    Thanks again to all involved in carrying on this critically important work. Howard Zinn and “Teaching People’s History” site Rock!!

    Response shared by katy kay — August 26, 2014 @ 4:44 pm

Add your comment:

Thanks very much for leaving a comment.